Unlike most business processes and functions for which companies can implement controls to manage their risk, licensors must trust and rely on the internal control environment of their licensees to ensure intellectual property (IP) is protected and they are compensated fairly. Licensors must maintain professional skepticism to determine how to monitor the effectiveness of the licensee’s controls surrounding the protection and utilization of their IP while maintaining a symbiotic relationship.
Consider the following example: In the first quarter of 2007, a consumer electronics company that manufactures and distributes products through multiple channels discovered it had been paying royalties to the incorrect licensor. This had been occurring since the inception of the licensing agreement nearly two years earlier, with approximately $1.2 million disbursed incorrectly. All three companies involved were publicly held. The occurrence of such a major error raises many questions:
- How did this happen?
- Why did internal controls as mandated by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act fail to catch this error?
- Did any red flags emerge for the licensor when it did not receive required royalty payments?
- With regard to the company receiving incorrect royalty payments, was there a significant shift in royalty revenue from this licensee to this company? Did anyone at this company notice or wonder why?
This publication offers guidance to individuals responsible for licensing programs and for those responsible for monitoring compliance to licensing requirements. It includes information on the most common types of licensed IP, common compliance components in most license agreements, typical licensing channel relationships, common licensing risks, and leading practices in effective licensing programs. Additionally, it highlights some examples of the types of analytics utilized in monitoring a licensing channel.
Although this white paper was written with licensors in mind, companies that license IP have a stake in ensuring that their licenses and royalty-reporting processes are adequately controlled and free from error. In view of this, many of the concepts discussed here can be used by licensees to improve their own processes.
Download the entire article:
![Ensuring Proper Royalties[1].pdf](/KnowledgeLeader/Content.nsf/dce93ca8c1f384d6862571420036f06c/2d3d5a19ba0c54ca8825776e006fcf1e/CenterText/0.BBE!OpenElement&FieldElemFormat=gif)